Reply to VDOE - VMPI is dead? Isn't that illegal?

Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS

Reply to "VDOE - VMPI is dead? Isn't that illegal? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][guardian][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]VMPI is disastrous for public schools. It’s a very good thing that he is getting rid of it.

To the pp that was lamenting about just buying in a good school district and now going to have to look at private. You should send him an email to thank him. He just saved your good public school.

[/quote]

Why - because blending algebra & geometry and adding data science was really that terrible?

[/quote]

No, because they wanted to put all kids in the same math class until 10th or 11th grade. I hate Youngkin and did not vote for him but I'm glad this is gone. [/quote]

That idea that was loosely floated (not even on infographic) around a year ago was squashed several months ago. Stop spreading disinformation. 
[/quote]

It was actually in the initial proposal as was equity as the #1 goal (not math education), then it was quickly walked back and equity was put further down the list of goals. They were waiting until after the election until releasing the final version. It truly was like a "you have to pass it to find out what's in it". Didn't vote for him, but know a lot of Asian people who did solely for this issue.[/quote]

You have a problem with VDOE making sure that Virginia's math curriculum isn't leaving certain students behind or unprepared to hold a job?[/quote]

Of course not. But let’s not leave them behind by devoting resources to help them catch up and be their very best, not by holding advanced kids back. [/quote]

VMPI would not do that.  This was clarified a long time ago, you just don't want to acknowledge it because it guts your best argument against VMPI.[/quote]

People still “concerned” about advanced math are either not paying attention or have ulterior motives. 
[/quote]

Yes, my ulterior motive was making sure my son could get into Algebra early before that opportunity was taken away from him. [/quote]

LCPS changes weren’t driven by VMPI. You’re blaming VDOE for a decision LCPS made.

[/quote]

I’m the previous poster you are responding to. I don’t live in Loudoun County—I live in Arlington. [/quote]

APS was already slowing down acceleration years ago. After accelerating it. The course offerings and pathways have fluctuated over the years, driven by the APS math department. Not VMPI - it didn’t exist then. 
[/quote]

I am aware of that, but the concern was whether VMPI would prod Arlington to further limit access to advanced math, such as Algebra in 7th grade, beyond the changes they had already made. Especially in light of changes that they had to make on the fly to the 6th grade math curriculum due to virtual learning (a necessity due to the extenuating circumstances), there was a legitimate concern that Arlington would use proposed changes at the state level to further restrict or eliminate the ability to take Algebra in 7th grade.  And farther out, there was a separate concern about how the transition would take place to the new curriculum for those who are advanced in math. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics