Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Reply to "Hot off the presses - Arlington Parents for Education New Newsletter"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If this were my first exposure to APE this would all be very interesting but knowing that the same organization that now seems to be asking for increased teacher salaries was last year complaining that teachers were overly concerned about their health during covid and weren't working hard enough with remote learning tells me something about where the group really stands when it comes to teachers. I'm at the point where APE says anything and I feel like I need to fact check it three different ways before I actually trust that it's true and not the product of some right-ish (for NOVA) wing spin machine. Beware.[/quote] Agreed![/quote] +1 It’s a shame they didn’t just stick with the section about the testing. They didn’t even *lead* with that. Instead, they started with that Northam/VDOE nonsense. [/quote] Tell me you didn’t read the newsletter without telling me you didn’t read the newsletter.[/quote] Which section do you think they led with? Wasn’t testing… Hint: Go re-read the OP. [/quote] Troll. School closures / SOLs / VMPI. All BS related to the current election. And apparently the #1 priority. Section 2 was advocating for more testing. That was the only substantial section relevant to APS. Rest of newsletter was political filler. [/quote] You think public school closure regulations, standardized testing in public schools, and math curriculum in public schools have nothing to do with our public schools? That’s a new theory.[/quote] Yes, they started with a bunch of BS faux issues about “State-Level Education-Related Proposals and Legislation” because of the election. They should have stuck with advocating for more testing. An actual issue with an actual solution that can help kids stay in the school. The rest is BS, misinformation, or filler. [/quote] What part was misinformation? I am still confused about how public school regulation doesn’t relate to public schools. Do you think that just because the group’s focus is on APS they can’t advocate at all any level of public education regulation?[/quote] VMPI was misinformation. School closures is 100% political BS (explained on other thread). Aside from the testing section, the rest was filler. Weak sauce. [/quote] Weakening SOL passing standards is filler?[/quote] Pretty much. What’s the point of focusing on an assessment from last year? It was a crazy year with so many atypical factors that certainly affected test scores? They may have adjusted it last year simply because kids couldn’t retake as they normally do. Or there were challenges with how it was given that skewed results. The actual issue is the learning gap and how to push this year to get kids back on track. That would have been a meaningful topic instead of the filler to rag on VDOE/Northam during a gubernatorial election. So transparent. [/quote] If that’s your view, then you actually should be really concerned about the changes to reading passing standards. The point of those passing standards isn’t to set a curve that ensures a certain number of students pass every year, it’s supposed to be to identify students and schools who aren’t meeting grade level standards for reading ability. Dropping the minimum score to pass that dramatically conceals how many children are not reading at the level they should be, which only reinforces the learning gap because it allows schools to pretend it doesn’t exist, or at least not to the extent it does. Look what it’s done in practical terms - math scores weren’t adjusted he same way, we saw a massive drop in pass rates, and everyone is focused on how to address learning loss in math. We should be doing the same for reading but we’re not because this manipulation of passing scores let’s everyone pretend reading is going just fine.[/quote] Schools and teachers should absolutely assess and determine where to focus efforts on remediation this year. The SOL assessments from last year may not be the best tool to accomplish that. Focusing on that now (Oct 2021) is distracting from practical efforts to get kids back on track. APE has an opportunity to advocate for meaningful things here for our kids (like they did pushing for more covid testing). It’s a shame they would rather play politics. [/quote] I don’t think you really understand the issue, because there are huge disconnects in your reasoning. You agree that schools should be addressing learning loss and providing remediation to students who are falling behind, right? So why are you fighting against efforts to highlight to extent of learning loss when it comes to reading, thereby enabling APS ignore the needs of students who are falling behind? This is such a weird hill to choose to die on just because you don’t like APE.[/quote] Again, that is a non-meaningful area of focus if their real concern is remediation. That was sandwiched in between “school closures” and VMPI, right? All non-meaningful areas of focus for topic #1. Like I said, they should have stuck with topic #2 (pushing for more covid testing). And/or add meaningful ways to address remediation. But I guess they want to get in on the political games. That’s their new focus. [/quote] DP. You will never get APS to provide meaningful remediation if APS will not admit there is a need for remediation in the first place. The changes to SOL scoring allow APS to pretend that remediation is not needed for reading. APE is trying to hold APS accountable so they will provide remediation. I do not understand why you are fighting that so hard. [/quote] I'm not "fighting" anything - just pointing out APE's priorities. Why did APE also include school closures (twice) & VMPI as its #1 topic for this newsletter? [/quote] I have no idea why they chose the particular order for the news letter because I didn't write it. But since they are an educational advocacy group, legislative action on education issues seems like an appropriate topic for them to comment on. [/quote] Pushing “schools closures” as the top issue in Oct ‘21, weeks before Election Day, is sus. [/quote] You think Janet Howell is sus? Patrick Hope? Rip Sullivan? Alfonso Lopez? Hala Ayala? They all voted in favor of SB1303. [/quote] Uh. They voted on it back in Feb/Mar. It’s now October. Who legit thinks “school closures” is a concern now? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
