Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Reply to "APS Fall boundary questionnaire "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’d make Claremont a neighborhood school and move immersion to Drew. Immersion is a draw for many Fairlington/Shirlington families. [/quote] Making Drew an option school isn’t politically viable right now. It was mostly option Montessori until a few years ago and there was a big push to make it a neighborhood school to right the wrong done generations ago via bussing. Making it option again would be insensitive/racist/inequitable/etc and would be a whole cluster. [/quote] I understand that the community was wary of the Montessori program siphoning resources away from the neighborhood program. I also get that it’s easy to quickly defend any changes to Drew as racist or harmful, but meanwhile APS is steadily building a new map of segregation and inequity. Drew can’t sit at 80% occupied while other APS schools become over crowded, especially schools with high FARMs. [/quote] The Green Valley old timers would say to just redraw the lines and fill it up... and they wouldn’t be wrong. There is an overcrowded school zone bordering a school zone that has empty seats. The answer is very straightforward. As for the overall segregation, that’s inevitable as long as we have neighborhood schools and the county board keeps approving 300+ unit CAFs in the same handful of places. [/quote] Maybe the point about creating segregation will resonate with the county board. I just don’t think they care about schools, but maybe they care about perpetuating segregation (or rather they could me motivated to stop perpetuating segregation).[/quote] I’m a DP, but as best as I can figure out, it’s easiest for the County and developers to approve or redevelop CAFs in certain places, and so they continue to approve buildings for those places only. Then the problem perpetuates itself. The segregation problem is most pronounced in 22207, but the County and others like to lecture the rest of us about how we aren’t being “inclusive” enough if we question this pattern. I think they know and don’t care.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics