Reply to Assault allegation

Forum Index » Tweens and Teens

Reply to "Assault allegation "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Well, we have an immediate example of what can happen if you bury your head in the sand and don't get your child any qualified help: you end up with a Josh Duggar. There's a [b]decent chance he'd still be a pedophile because some people just are[/b] and there's not much to be done about it, but who knows? And who knows what other things he's done in the last 20 years that no one has found out yet?

I hope to never find myself in this situation, but if I thought there was a chance it could be true, lawyer and therapist. Not necessarily in that order.[/quote]

Nope.  Not even partially correct.  No child is born a pedophile and there is no pedophile DNA.  Pedophiles are created by their environment.

If Josh Duggar is a pedophile then his parents and his upbringing have a large contribution to that.  He has the final control, certainly, because otherwise we could all be doing the unthinkable but his parents and upbringing certainly contributed to what he has become.[/quote]

Citation needed. This article disagrees: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/29/us/pedophiles-online-sex-abuse.html#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20biological%20clues%20attached%20to,of%20development%20in%20the%20womb.%E2%80%9D[/quote]

The article and "study" has been widely discredited by all reputable organizations.  Stop publishing nonsense.[/quote]

I was unaware that Nature was an uncredited publication.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41398-018-0326-0

I've asked you for citations to back up your grand proclamations that pedophilia has zero to do with genetics and all you've done is fire off snarky insults. I therefore have to conclude that you can't back it up. [/quote]
DP. She isn't being "snarky." She is calmly stating facts. You're the one being hyperbolic. You lost. Get over it. Although I agree that you need to stop posting inaccurate crap like this.[/quote]

WHAT is inaccurate about a Nature (an extremely reputable gold standard scientific journal that is very difficult to be published in) from barely 2 years ago highlighting findings that pedophiles have been found to have prenatal differences? I genuinely don't get it. If there are prenatal differences, how can it be claimed to be entirely environmental like PP is saying? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics