Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Science at Liberal Arts Colleges: A Better Education?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If you come out with a STEM degree at a school like UC Berkeley, that is incredibly impressive. Much more so than Middlebury or Colby or Swarthmore. UC Berkeley STEM is cutthroat and hard as hell. [/quote] You think Swarthmore STEM isn’t hard? Okay buddy. [/quote] Not saying it isn’t hard but Swarthmore way overplays their intellectual and tough brand. Really not that different from other SLACS. Top 10 SLACs are pretty much indistinguishable but Swarthmore is more braggy. They act like they are UChicago or Columbia. Big chip on their shoulder for some reason.[/quote] Maybe it's because so many Swatties go onto earn PhDs? Historically, it is THE feeder for top doctoral programs across multiple disciplines, including STEM fields. https://www.swarthmore.edu/institutional-research/doctorates-awarded[/quote] This list is suspect since Williams is not on it. [/quote] Why is it surprising? Some SLACs are known to be PhD feeders and others not. Neither is good not bad; just different. Fit is important.[/quote] This. Isn't Williams more of a feeder to Wall St and big consulting jobs? That list isn't some random opinion, it's the National Science Foundation's Survey of Earned Doctorates that they've been doing for over 60 years.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics