Reply to S/O: Illegal Aliens (For or Against)

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "S/O: Illegal Aliens (For or Against)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]against, and for changing automatic birth citizenship to when at least 1 parent is a citizen. No more anchor babies.[/quote]

Why do you hate the Constitution?[/quote]

The Constitutionnever intended for coutries near our borders to have their citizens sneak over and plop out babies to get free benifits and all the things that come with citizenship. The balance of income vs expendetures is going to bankrupt our nation. You can't have all these poor new people coming in getting public assistance when the parents never paid a dime into the system, it unsustainable. look at california, that state is fucked. Luckily there are enough moron liberal movie star and rich people who don't mind throwing away their money to taxes that it has a tiny amount of taxed income streams but even with that california is BANKRUPT.[/quote]

Complaining that a significant group of people are leading to the demise of the economy and the country . . . let's see, where have we heard that before?  [/quote]

I hope you're not referencing black people, because if so, your premise is very faulty. We (I'm black) were brought here by force and enslaved for hundreds of years before we were emancipated. We were here *prior* to the writing of the Constitution and when the injustices were finally realized by society, amendments were made to grant us freedom and full liberty.

Illegals enter our borders *after* the writing of the Constitution, so at their very entry in the US, they are criminals and should be offered no protection under US law. They certainly shouldn't be allowed to benefit from many government services.

Either enter legally or don't enter. What's so hard (or wrong) about that? I wouldn't be so bold as to enter another country illegally and not expect to be told/asked to leave and I certainly wouldn't insist that it's my right to have access to welfare, free education, free healthcare, etc. It's really quite absurd.[/quote]
Not the PP, but its obvious if you have an understanding of history.
"I say: my feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Saviour as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to the fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as sufferer but as fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and of adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. Today, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before—the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice. And as a man I have the duty to see to it that human society does not suffer the same catastrophic collapse as did the civilization of the ancient world some two thousand years ago—a civilization which was driven to its ruin through this same Jewish people. "
"The Catholic Church considered the Jews pestilent for fifteen hundred years, put them in ghettos, etc, because it recognized the Jews for what they were... I recognize the representatives of this race as pestilent for the state and for the church and perhaps I am thereby doing Christianity a great service by pushing them out of schools and public functions. "
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics