Reply to Female physical attributes for positions

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Female physical attributes for positions"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]While there are always exceptions but this article shows the typical size and skills needed by positions in women’s college soccer:

https://www.ncsasports.org/womens-soccer/recruiting-guidelines

It seems most positions requires a player to be at least 5’5”. [/quote]

Lmfao. Dumbest comment of the year[/quote]

Why?  The PP posted a good article explaining what college recruiters look for. Unless you have any better article, please STFU. [/quote]

When I see dumb comments like this about sports and athletic ability, I like to post Tom Brady's evaluations from scouting reports back some 20 years ago. They go something like this:

"Poor build ... Skinny ... Lacks great physical stature and strength ... Lacks mobility and ability to avoid the rush ... Lacks a really strong arm ... Can’t drive the ball downfield ... Does not throw a really tight spiral ... System-type player who can get exposed if forced to ad lib ... Gets knocked down easily."

[/quote]

His IQ and technical proficiency are more important for his position which doesn't require mobility, specifically in the offenses he's been in.[/quote]

My point is just at the end of the day recruiters can be wrong about potential and talent and are wrong a lot of the time. That's all.

Oh and Tom Brady said this about himself:

"I think my best asset as a player is that in the fourth quarter, with the game on the line, [b]I have the desire to win[/b] and the feeling that our team is not going to lose."[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics