Reply to Amy Coney Barrett and IVF

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "Amy Coney Barrett and IVF "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

[/quote]

If she gets appointed, the Democrats are well within their rights to court pack. She has radical opinions that would limit fundamental rights, appointed by a [b]President who did not win the popular vote.[/b] [/quote]

That has no bearing on whether or not she should be appointed.  Get off the Senate Dems press team talking points email list.

[/quote]
Here’s why it does have a bearing on whether the Senate should proceed with the confirmation process before the end of January:

In 2016, McConnell and other Senate Republicans said that the reason why they would not comply with the US Constitution by holding a confirmation hearing for Merrick Garland, Obama’s nominee, was because it was an election year and the American people deserved to have a say in which president would get to appoint the next justice. Then voters chose Clinton. The American people did not choose Trump, yet he was handed Obama’s appointment. MCConnell and Senate Republicans have flip flopped and now say that ACB should have a confirmation hearing less than 30 days before an election.  They don’t want to leave the choice up to the American people. Democrats are asking for fairness, consistency, and parity in how SC appointments are handled in election years. The Democrats want there to be one standard, regardless of the party affiliations of the President and the Senate majority.

Republicans have been faithfully (and successfully!) executing a multi-pronged scheme to pack the federal courts for years.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics