Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Who thinks the new TJ admissions proposal will increase URM enrollment? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I find it extremely racist to dismiss the lack of diversity at TJ as: those URM kids are just not interested. I am a URM minority. My child is at TJ. So, this post is from someone who has firsthand experience with the school. The school is trying to fix the insanely huge diversity problem. No one is saying that the quality of the education has to go down. But, being the very top school in the nation (based largely on test scores) is not nearly as important to me as us giving URM children a chance to experience a high quality STEM program. And, giving the students the opportunity to work with peers from diverse backgrounds, including black and latinx families. [b] Their "lack of interest" (which has never been proven) is likely lack of exposure to STEM, lack of resources to pursue STEM activities, and a general feeling of not being accepted in those privileged groups who do have access/resources. [/b] These uniformed and biased arguments about why URM are not currently at TJ reminds me of our country's past where white culture promoted the idea that black people were less intelligent and physically stronger so they want to work in the fields. Why would they want a STEM education? Is the current change in admission policy perfect, no. But, can we please respect that the State is trying to address a very important problem. And, they should not stop until it's addressed. They have tried other options in the past that failed. So, keep trying. I respect what they are trying to do. [/quote] Look, the bolded is the problem. But to fix it, you need programs that are long-term, expensive, booooring to implement and start very, very early. It's not a TJ problem. The SB is too chicken to admit that this is the problem and commit to fixing it. They want a quick fix. They got it in the lottery - which will do absolutely nothing about exposure to STEM in early ears or adding resources to pursue STEM activities. [/quote] Wait for the presentation on solving the pipeline issues. Brabrand indicated that the lottery was part 1 of a three part plan, #2 being the pipeline and #3 being wraparound support for the TJ population. Hopefully they will take 2 and 3 as seriously as they take 1.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics