Reply to Men: How often do you go on dates with a woman you are not attracted to?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Men: How often do you go on dates with a woman you are not attracted to?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Very few will. But the world will bend over backwards telling women to give chances to unattractive guys. [/quote]
50% of men find 50% of women to be "attractive" so why would any man ask out THIS (unattractive) girl when there is a different (ATTRACTIVE) girl standing 3 feet over there?
Meanwhile 80% of women find only 20% of men to be "attractive" so just do some basic math and you can see why the world tells women to adjust their standards.[/quote]

Cite.[/quote]

https://quillette.com/2019/03/12/attraction-inequality-and-the-dating-economy/[/quote]

"Yet another study, run by OkCupid on their huge datasets, found that women rate 80 percent of men as “worse-looking than medium,” and that this 80 percent “below-average” block received replies to messages only about 30 percent of the time or less. By contrast, men rate women as worse-looking than medium only about 50 percent of the time, and this 50 percent below-average block received message replies closer to 40 percent of the time or higher."

This only makes sense if you ignore the way women and men use online dating. Men will swipe right on EVERYONE, then they're picky once they see who matched with them. A swipe doesn't mean he was attracted. Whereas many women will swipe left on conventionally attractive men when their profile is noting more than "ay im tony wanna fuk?" It also doesn't account for bots and fakes.

Also, online dating doesn't give us evidence of anything outside of online dating. AND the study by OKC is old AF and forgets that OKC used a "star" system as a way of blocking. OCK also took down their own study because incels wouldn't stop misinterpreting it.

Overall when it comes to looks women are more generous than men are. [/quote]

There were 2 different studies mentioned in the cited link. Both say the same thing. If OKC has stopped publishing this data, it is not because the facts have changed but rather to appease left wing media agenda for “gender equality” despite clear data evidence to the contrary.

You are confused about what “attraction” means. Remember that tingling inside your panties in the presence of a HAWT guy? That is attraction. What you call “women’s generosity” actually proves my point. Women often (usually) wind up dating guys they aren’t really attracted to (ie, 80% of the male population). But he is a good provider and super nice. No wonder 3 years in she’s lost all desire for sex: never really attracted in the first place. [/quote]

Data that's misinterpreted is useless. Despite your incel screeching that doesn't change how the websites collected data and why you and other incels misinterpret it to fit your crazy agenda. [/quote]

Show us where that data has been correctly (according to your view) interpreted. Citation, please.[/quote]

The data, that is more than 10 years old, has been removed. Because people kept saying it was saying something it wasn't. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics