Reply to These NYTimes blueberry muffins are so simple, so cheap, and OMG good. Seriously, make them

Forum Index » Food, Cooking, and Restaurants

Reply to "These NYTimes blueberry muffins are so simple, so cheap, and OMG good. Seriously, make them"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We made them.  I thought they were pretty gross.  Too sugary.  It really affirms for me that the NYT Cooking section is pretty bad and that someone is trying very hard to use DCUM to advertise the NYT.  Shame on them.[/quote]

I've given shout outs to NYT food section before, and I swear I don't work there. I haven't tried these muffins yet. If I did, I'd probably cut the sugar in half. I do that for many desserts. This recipe looks extra sweet.[/quote]

I don't believe you.  I think you're doing a bad job at trying to be an "influencer."  Reason:  no one puts the source in the title.  The only posts that do are the skanks trying to be NYT influencers.  Go back and look at page after page of threads.  The evidence is very clear.[/quote]

Just to clarify since you're responding to me, I didn't start this particular thread. Haven't made the muffins. They look too sweet as written. I get the NYT through work, so I use their food section. Have had mostly great experiences, especially using the comments. So much better than many blogs where people give high ratings based on how something looks - the NYT commenters are generally people who have made the dish and are constructive.

My main "miss" from NYT was actually one of their most popular recipes accros other platforms like Instagram. "The stew." I thought it was tremendously bland.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics