Reply to How neutral is Catherine Herridge

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "How neutral is Catherine Herridge"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Uh, the dossier and Mueller report say the same thing. Page met with Russian officials and negotiated a sale worth billions of dollars, particularly to the middlemen who get a cut, including Page.

Just because Page downplayed it to Mueller doesn't mean that the dossier was wrong, particularly in context of the Trump Tower meetings over "adoptions" (which is code for lifting Russian sanctions)

Please, use your head.[/quote]

Rosenstein testified that if he knew then, what he knows now about the dossier, he never would have signed the Page FISA warrant.

The dossier was bunk, pure bunk, courtesy of the Russians...disinformation that Clinton's campaign paid for.[/quote]

It wasn't pure bunk. There are many elements in it that have panned out as true. There is very little of it that has been flat out debunked, as "unverified" doesn't mean "false"[/quote]

What was "verified" was stuff that was already publicly available, according to Horowitz:

"At the time the FBI submitted its first FISA application, Horowitz writes, it had “corroborated limited information in Steele’s election reporting, and most of that was publicly available information.” Horowitz says of Steele’s reports: “The CIA viewed it as ‘internet rumor.’”"

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/horowitz-report-steele-dossier-collusion-news-media-924944/

And, if "many elements" have been panned out as true, then why did Rosenstein testify that if he knew then, what he knows NOW, he never would have signed the FISA application.?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics