Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Diet, Nutrition & Weight Loss
Reply to "Controversial opinion: Against “Body diversity” in social media ads"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Many professional modeling agencies that deal with big fashion brands only have two divisions--traditional models and plus-sized. So anything not in those two is basically ignored. Anytime you see a woman who doesn't fit into those buckets in high fashion print or runway it is almost ALWAYS an exception and some special celebrity appearance by a woman who has done something amazing, like win multiple Oscars, like Kate Winslet. https://www.eonline.com/news/285235/nailed-it-kate-winslet-s-new-st-john-ads-are-stunning I'd love to more professional models that looked like her in high fashion--neither traditional model build nor plus size. Her body looks amazing in the clothing.[/quote] This. I’m a healthy BMI, I’m also tall and a size 10-12. The new inclusive models are great for people who aren’t a size 0 to see what clothes will look like on them. However seeing clothes on a size 18-20 model doesn’t help me. I wish most models were a size medium or 6-8. I feel like I can extrapolate from a size 8 model what I will look like in a 12. I feel like a size 2-4 person could also use their imagination to mentally size down. Even a size 14 woman, which I thought was the most common size - could judge more from a size 8 model than a size 22 one. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics