Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Is SSMA really that bad?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Demographic trends tell an interesting story about both schools. We’ll see what the picture looks like in August. I am optimistic about renewal and will continue to support the school. My children are thriving and very happy. [/quote] Same here. I am the pp who commented about having two kids at SSMA who are happy at the school, have fantastic teachers, and consistently thrive in Montessori. As an example my oldest kids academic level is two grades above his current level (not bragging but shedding light into performance). I do not feel threatened by the attendance policy and see it as a normal thing and agree with other posters regarding the school’s interest to check in on students who miss several classes. As a parent I am too concern about children who may have been missing class whether it is because their parents can’t support virtual education or they have a less than ideal home environment (parent neglect etc). I do not consider my self a school booster and rarely comment on these threads, but I can tell you from first-hand experience that the school’s virtual education was far more better than one of the Dcps well regarded schools (won’t name the school), and that is my point of comparison when saying that I was impressed by their ability to quickly pulling together the DL program. The scores may not be the best, but the school’s communication continues to improve, the guides and admin staff do genuinely care about the students. For the upcoming school year the school have asked parents feedback to make a decision on the schedule based on CDC/DC guidance. For me a school is more than standardized tests.[/quote] I'm glad your family is having a good experience. Can you speak to 1) Why re-enrollment is so much lower than the other public/charter montessori schools in the city? 2) Why teacher and staff turnover is so much higher than the other montessori schools in the city?[/quote] IDK. Perhaps because it has the highest percentage of AA students than any other public charter Montessori and some families are looking for a different level of diversity? [/quote] Really, you think that's it? Lee Montessori reenrollment: 86.4% Lee Montessori AA percentage: 39% Shining Stars Montessori reenrollment: 69.8% Shining Stars Montessori AA percentage: 44% CHML AA percentage: 66% CHML reenrollment percentage: 73% The actual data sure does put a crimp in your racism theory. I mean, CHML disproves it right up front and if you think the extra 5% of AA student leads to a 17% lower reenrollment rate, then you are exactly what is wrong with the school. The school won't improve until people are able to look seriously at its flaws and take steps to address them rather than throwing out accusations of racism. **I did not include breakthrough, since, unlike the other three it only goes up to 6th grade which makes the data less comparable from my perspective. [/quote] And is that last years CHML re-enrollment figure? Because I think it’s normally way higher. The swing space destroyed some of the younger grades — PK4, in particular, likely ended up with a re-enrollment figure below 50%.[/quote] I used what was available on the report card but I've always been confused about which year that represents. Regardless, their re-enrollment rate has always been higher than SSMA. I think it is hugely problematic the way many at SSMA claim that those who raised concerns or choose to leave the school (we're a former SSMA family who ended up at a neighborhood DCPS with a much higher percentage of AA students than SSMA) do so because of racism. It prevents them from looking seriously at the school's flaws, and continues to enable Dr. R's abhorrent behavior. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics