Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "AAP Equity report"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] [b]When adjusted for test scores, an AA kid is more than 5 times more likely to be selected than a white or Asian kid with the same stats.[/b] [/quote] Now that is a disturbing stat.[/quote] If you want the full context, it's the first paragraph on page 27[/quote] The full context is that the system has been heavily rigged in favor of URM and they still end up being underrepresented. Do we need to rig the system further or should we do something different? Since when does Equality mean equal outcome in this country? [/quote] Thanks for the info. I understand trying to level the playing field, but lowering the standard based on race isn't going to solve any problems. These opportunities are finite, and you are denying an opportunity to a more qualified student because of their race. 5x more likely is just insane. It's like they never learn. I would love for these kids to get more help early on that would make them more competitive.[/quote] The leveling of the playing field means not allowing for parent referrals which are used far more by White families. The counterbalance to that was to lower the score to be in pool since the current score represents the top 2% of the scores and is pretty high. Given that the average CogAT score was a 119, lowering the in-pool score to 125 or something along those lines, While removing referrals, will increase the pool and raise the average score in AAP AND help level the playing field.[/quote] I like this suggestion but agree with the report that they should also be using local (i.e. school-based) norms. Lower the in-pool score to the 120s but then make a rule that the top 10% of scorers in each elementary are automatically in-pool as well. That helps capture the high performers in Title I schools who might otherwise be missed. No more parent referrals. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics