Reply to ECNL Mid-Atantlic

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL Mid-Atantlic"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]ECNL added 15 clubs this spring.

Good clubs to be sure but that is also 270 more players per age group. That is nearly 2000 kids per age group.

Again the entire league was just 900 kids. The league essentially, in one spring added nearly a third of what was once it’s entire player pool.

It is now just a showcasing platform that for most kids is no longer particularly difficult to make a team anymore. [/quote]

You mean "this spring" as in when the USSF give everyone the middle finger? You mean "this spring" when ECNL added some of the (as you say) "Elite" clubs in the nation? You mean "this spring" ECNL grew as a result of USSF incompetency?

Cool. Already knew that [/quote]

And now your kid is among 2000 other kids. How exactly did she gain any separation with the patch again?

Most kids who are competent can find a spot on a ECNL roster now. [/quote]

I've been involved with ECNL for some time now. You're bark up the wrong tree. Try your faulty analysis on parents that you can mold for your personal goals. 09-06 is your target. You are wearing your insecurities on your sleeve. Everything will be alright. ECNL is about college....that's about as far as 99.999 kids will go. And that is alright as well. You see, women don't really aren't truly elite athletes until they're in the 20's.  However, you keep trying to pick winners at 12, 13, 14, 15, 16. Its a failed policy. I assure you.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics