Reply to 2020 AAP Acceptances

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "2020 AAP Acceptances"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think GBRS and school submitted samples play a very important role. Dare I say more important than Cogat it seems! [/quote]

I agree, but I think it's absurd.  Good work samples are more likely to show high executive function than high intelligence.  Likewise, there are many things that bias GBRS.  The system is set up to select upper middle class, above average kids who are somewhat advanced.  This is actually a good fit for the program, since AAP itself best serves exactly those kids.  It's weird, though, that a program that is supposed to serve gifted kids fails to identify a bunch of them, and then falls far short of serving their needs when they are in the program.  It's also odd that the schools keep harping about the achievement gap, but then continue changing AAP admissions in a way that is likely to admit even more already privileged kids.[/quote]

Problem is that CogAT is not the best measure of identifying gifted child either.  None of the measures are perfect anyways.  CogAT can be easily prepped and kids in 120's can be easily prepped to get 130's.  [/quote]

Which is why they use the NNAT, CoGAT, GBRSs, and Work Samples. They should give the committee a more complete picture of the kids under review. If you add in the parent questionnaire,  parent provided work samples, and awards/letters of recommendation. The process is not perfect. There are different groups of 5 that review packets who have different ideas about what should be weighted and what is important. That is why the appeal can be useful. It is a different group of people looking at the packet and with affirming or changing the original decision.

The program is what it is. Most of the people I know who had kids go through it thought it was a solid program and their kids enjoyed it. The only negative I have heard some people mention is that it is not the greatest social experience at the Center schools. It sounds like at our Center that the kids end up segregating by their base school. But no one has said that the academic portion is too slow or problematic. There is a small group of parents who seem to think that it moves too slowly. I suspect a good number of those parents have had their kids in some type of after school tutoring for a few years. The material feels slow because their kids are ahead due to the tutoring programs. I get that impression from the posts I have seen on this site and talking to some of my friends whose kids are at different schools. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics