Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "IMPACT and compensation - does it really look like this?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]You assume IMPACT has identified and removed bad teachers - because that's what you read in the papers? because DCPS says so? I hope some of the teachers it identified were worthy of dismissal but don't know that at all. It's looking like some were dismissed based on low value-added scores due to to bogus inflated scores from previous classes implicated in the cheating scandal I do know that IMPACT has stifled teachers, forcing them to conform to IMPACTs nine elements in 30 minutes when it doesn't make sense for the lesson. I know there are concerns and evidence regarding master educators being unfair and unqualified - and overworked to the point that they can neither provide good feedback or offer help. There's also been a lot of turnover among MEs, so constant training is needed - another big expense. I know there are good, even great teachers who refuse to play the game and leave DCPS or get fired. I know that some principals feel IMPACT required duties prevent them from supporting and getting to know their teachers and to truly help them, instead of spending hours filling in a questionable rubric. IMPACT is costly and has shown poor ROI - scores aren't improving and teachers feel they aren't able to teach as well - even ones who do well on IMPACT.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics