Reply to Assumption of dating pool for divorced 40s women with kids

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Assumption of dating pool for divorced 40s women with kids"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]The balls are not materially different in the 50s. Even 60s.

PP here. I beg to differ. Both as a woman who dates and sees them on occasion and as a healthcare provider who sees them weekly.[/quote]

Can anyone provide scientific support that the "sagging" noted above actually happens?  For example, a link to an article in a medical journal would be considered support.  However, anecdotal information (e.g., I am a healthcare provider, and I see ____ of them and can tell you this is true) is meaningless.

The idea that this is true for all (or most) men is similar to the notion that women who have a large number of sexual partners lose elasticity and cannot have sex.

People repeat these ideas as fact without understanding if they are true at all.[/quote]

Mechanical properties of human skin in vivo: a comparative evaluation in 300 men and women.  Skin Res Technol. 2014 May;20(2):127-35. doi: 10.1111/srt.12094.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23889488

There are dozens of studies just like this, but this is a good one because it looks specifically at men's aging skin and loss of elasticity.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics