Reply to How many women would be fine to never have sex with DH if it didn't bother them?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "How many women would be fine to never have sex with DH if it didn't bother them?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If he was okay with me self satisfying once or twice a week, yes it’s fine.

I could not imagine tossing my H aside if he did not want sex.

[b]Love  is not sex.[/b][/quote]

It can be a way of expressing love. I think your statement is way too general. You can have love without sex or sex without love. You can't generalize about the relationship between the two. [/quote]

No it’s not. It’s a way to satisfy a physical pleasure. It’s not love.[/quote]

It can be purely about physical pleasure, but it can also be a powerful way of expressing love. Not the only way to express love, of course, but a powerful way.

I don't know why that's controversial. [/quote]

It’s one way.., not the only way, why is that controversial.
[/quote]

When did I say it was the only way? PPs have said "It's a way to satisfy physical pleasure. It's not love." That's simply untrue. [/quote]

It’s very true. It’s not love. It’s a way to physically enjoy each other... just like a massage, or drinking champagne or enjoying a dance.... it’s not love:

Its not necessary for love.[/quote]

It's not necessary for love, but just like kissing or a massage or dancing with each other, it can be a way of expressing love.

Boiling it down to physical pleasure devalues what it can be in the context of a loving relationship. It equates sex with a loving partner with banging a hooker or something. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics