Reply to They are exposing whistleblower. Drudge report

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "They are exposing whistleblower. Drudge report"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Iim trying to get it, but I don’t get it. Trump supporters:  Is there any legitimate, non-shameful, reason to learn the whistleblower’s political leanings?  Why is his/her motive relevant to the substance?

From drudge:
the public cannot assess his motives for striking out against the president. And they worry his political bias could color inquiry testimony and findings unless it’s exposed.
****
Let’s say he’s Obama’s nephew - how does that affect what’s happened?[/quote]

Evidently, he was "released" (fired) from a previous govt. job for leaking.  
His Trump Hate definitely colored his perception of the phone call.  And, considering he didn't even listen to it, one has to wonder if this was an organized effort, and if so, were any  in Congress involved?[/quote]

Apparently he colored Vindman's perception of the phone call. Both Vindmans.

Mind control? Maybe he's a Jedi?[/quote]

I think we will eventually find that Vindman went to this person. Vindman gave him the details.  [/quote]

I think we will find out that lots of people told lots of people how bad things were going with US-Ukraine policy, or lack thereof. [/quote]
Some of us have found that out already! Just by reading the public statement of those who have testified![/quote]

Prosecutors would LOVE it if the jury were able to decide guilty or not after simply listening to their opening statements. Every accused person would be found not guilty. [/quote]
This process is equivalent to an investigation, not a jury trial. Please keep up.[/quote]
+1. “Ken Starr "handed a tremendous amount of evidence to the House Judiciary Committee. How did he generate that evidence? In secret. What did he do? He put witnesses on before a grand jury ... Congressman Schiff is, in my opinion, following the rules of the House." - Andrew Napolitano, Fox News[/quote]

And, Adam Schiff is not "independent" by any stretch of the imagination.  Having him conduct this "investigation" is a joke.

[quote]Fox News contributor Ken Starr tells “The Daily Briefing with Dana Perino”  that having House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., in charge of the ongoing impeachment probe is a “huge mistake.”

“We’re looking to someone named Adam Schiff who for all of his intelligence and abilities, he does not enjoy the respect of the other side the way [chairman of the House Judiciary Committee ] Peter Rodino did during [President Richard Nixon] and the way [fomer chairman of the House Judiciary Committee] Henry Hyde during [President Bill] Clinton.”

The former independent counsel, speaking on Wednesday, added, “Huge mistake to vest so much authority and power in someone who does not enjoy the respect on the other side.”[/quote]

https://www.foxnews.com/media/former-independent-counsel-ken-starr-calls-adam-schiff-leading-the-impeachment-probe-a-huge-mistake[/quote]

If DOJ had investigated this when they received two different criminal referrals about it from two different Trump appointees at two different agencies, then we wouldn’t be having this conversation. But they didn’t. So the House has to do it.[/quote]

No, the House doesn't have to do it. 
[b]DOJ found no reason to investigate.[/b]  That tells you something right there - this is a partisan effort to overturn the 2019 election - something the Dems have been wanting to do since election day.  [/quote]

Don't be silly. Barr is a partisan. You can't take anything he says seriously because he is completely biased. His is a partisan effort to block Congressional oversight, something Trump has been wanting to do since election day.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics