Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Oberlin defamation suit and verdict : not a good optic "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Don’t Oberlin’s liability insurance companies have a say on the litigation? If I have a car accident, it’s usually the insurance company that determines whether they will fight or settle. The insurance companies must’ve thought this is not as clear-cut as the $11 million judgment against Oberlin suggests. If so, there’s something wrong with the $11 million judgment. [/quote] You are assuming the insurance company is involved in funding Oberlin's defense (and [b]I've no indication that is true[/b]). And of course insurance companies sometimes make mistakes in assessing case risk. So there may be nothing "wrong" with the $11 million judgment other than that the insurance company (if it is involved) mis-assessed the litigation risk.[/quote] Source pls. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
