Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Oberlin defamation suit and verdict : not a good optic "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Don’t Oberlin’s liability insurance companies have a say on the litigation? If I have a car accident, it’s usually the insurance company that determines whether they will fight or settle. The insurance companies must’ve thought this is not as clear-cut as the $11 million judgment against Oberlin suggests. If so, there’s something wrong with the $11 million judgment. [/quote] You are assuming the insurance company is involved in funding Oberlin's defense (and I've no indication that is true). And of course insurance companies sometimes make mistakes in assessing case risk. So there may be nothing "wrong" with the $11 million judgment other than that the insurance company (if it is involved) mis-assessed the litigation risk.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
