Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Average cost for Travel"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]People arguing that clubs and coaches are raking in the benjamins like Warren Buffet have me ROFL. It's a low margin business across the board. [/quote] Yep, former board chair of a large local club here. I'd say zero-margin or even negative margin. The hardest part of my job was explaining to parents (and even some knuckle-headed board members) that our only source of revenues was fees and the fees barely cover the cost of the program. Biggest expense is salaries, and no one is well paid compared to the non-soccer world. Second biggest expense is fields, a surprising number of otherwise intelligent people think that fields just magically appear. The reason there is so much churn is that youth soccer is fundamentally a barrel-bottom-scraping business. [/quote] I agree the margins are thin to nonexistent but in the large clubs that includes a lot of salaries in the management/overhead. Lots of directors of this and that, who command a larger salaries than the coaches. It is disproportionate. I could give lots of examples of FT positions that are of questionable value to the kids like director of marketing. Sure some marketing is necessary and raising the general profile of the club is of indirect benefit to older players. But does making a FT position make sense to the development mission of the club? How does it benefit Ulittles who can’t attract and keep a quality coach and end up with complete inconsistency in coaching or second and third teams who by definition provide the bulk of the funding. Big clubs are non-profits so you can easily access their 990s. They prove your point the there’s not extra money sitting around. But they also show a lot of money is passing through and is used in ways that doesn’t fairly align with the interests and priorities of people proving that revenue. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics