Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Instead of Changing Boundaries Add New Programs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why can't the board add new programs to attract the right type of students to underperforming schools? The magnet programs have done a fabulous job. Are members of the board jealous of those us that live in good clusters? Are they doing this to punish us- seriously? [/quote] So you just ignore the masses, hoping they'll be covered up by students being bused into a magnet? How does that solve anything, genius? You punish yourself simply by being you.[/quote] Some underperforming schools are also underenrolled. If people voluntarily move from their high performing school to a low performing school because of a magnet program offering it does a few things. First, it solves a capacity issue. Secondly, it helps bring a [b]better peer group[/b] into the schools. Third, it helps balance schools with out ripping communities apart. Forth- if structured correctly high performing students in a low performing school with have access to some of the [b]programming benefits[/b]. Of course, it's easier just to call me names. [/quote] lol - Which parent in a W cluster is going to voluntarily move a child to an under-enrolled, underperforming school in Silver Spring, Gaithersburg or Germantown b/c of the addition of some magnet? Furthermore, there are test-in magnets and opt-in magnets. Opt-in magnets are normally for those already w/in the school cluster. (IB at Einstein, for example, for kids in the DCC) Finally, transportation issues are already a mess, with current magnet and consortia bus routes. Kids in magnets, for your information, are tracked. So there's little "mixing in" with the masses. Now, "better peer group," based upon contextual clues translates into wealthy (and most likely white) children with educated parents. That's highly offensive. But feel free to correct me. This "ripping apart of communities" means what? If you're pulling kids from "high-performing schools" to BUS them into under-enrolled, underperforming schools, is that not "ripping apart of communities?" And what are these "programming benefits" in low-performing schools? They won't qualify for free and reduced meals or subsidized after-school activities. For the record, I called you a genius. -educator with over 20 years of experience [/quote] OP here ....... * Magnet students are extremely capable students from all different races/income levels. I didn't bring up race or income. Why did you? * If people choose to send their children to a program/school outside the neighborhood why should I or anyone care? These folks are choosing the longer bus rides etc for the trade off of a great program. * Strong local peers will have access to some of the same classes. For example, if you offer a magnet program and math isn't part of the "magnet" per se local students who can handle the class can enroll. [b]With regards to your last point about not having subsidized school activities/ free meals- that might not exist either if you "mix" the boundaries.[/b] DP. No offense but you don't know what you are talking about..... [/quote][/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics