Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Quince Orchard community meeting for Boundary Analysis"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Boundary change needs to happen and while doing it if we can avoid situations like two ES in the same cluster ending with 7% and 70% FARMs then we should surely do that. BOE in their infinite wisdom decided to create boundary with 7% and 70% in RM cluster when new ES came online. [/quote] As a survivor of that disastrous boundary change study, school with 70% explicitly fought to stay that way. [/quote] Exactly. Also, is there really an RM school with only 7% FARMs? I thought all of the others were about 20-30%.[/quote] The projected FARMs rate by MCPS for Ritchie Park ES was 7%. Figures for 2017/18 show otherwise: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/regulatoryaccountability/glance/currentyear/schools/02227.pdf It went down by 2% from last year. However, take these figures with a grain of salt because now we all know that the MCPS figures can be wrong.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
