Reply to Sanctuary Cities are Stupid

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Sanctuary Cities are Stupid"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I'll bring these forward so they don't get missed from the prior page:

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
… These cases are going to continue to be contested until there is clear guidance issued. It may not happen under Trump, but it will be settled. The fact that everyone isn't on the same page at this moment doesn't mean it "must not be an issue." Actually, it's a looming one.

[/quote]

Give me a break. The ACLU is in every state. If they had a case they wouldve brought it by now in those jurisdictions who were participating.

The state of Massachusetts decided on their own. [b]Texas went the other direction as they just passed a law that banned sanctuary city policies and it was upheld[/b].[/quote]

Didn't the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals just a month or two ago rule that AG Paxton’s case to pre-emptively establish the constitutionality of the Governor's bill was “unconvincing,” leaving the door open for officials in Austin, San Antonio, and other sites to sue the state and try it on its merits in court? Which they later did, with those cases in progress, no?

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
[snipped out previous quotes for length]
I'm not clear how you sorted through which cases have and have not been filed, and those which are (or are not) being prepared. Could you talk me through the process?[/quote]

The ACLU does press releases everytime they sneeze. [b]No lawsuits on this have been announced[/b] but if you know of one feel free to post it. As I mentioned Texas anti- sanctuary city law was upheld. [/quote]

Ah. So what number of filings would you consider to be "an issue?" I can add the ones that are pending in Texas, if you like.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics