Reply to Specifically on-topic contributors to the Drew boundary issue only please -

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Specifically on-topic contributors to the Drew boundary issue only please -"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't know what you guys are arguing about above, but I'm a PP on this thread and a Nauck resident. Some of us have kids at Drew already and others are ready to send our kids there. 80%+ low income with a b.s. boundary stretching all the way to the west Pike is going to scare UMC parents, no doubt. But 60% with a great new principal and a new curriculum is a different story. Give it a chance to succeed. There's a reason many of us chose to live where we did, and it's not because we can't afford North Arlington.[/quote]
Bursting bubble in 3..2..1...

60% isn’t going to get you there. Please take a look at Barcroft. And don’t start with a bunch of BS about the year round calendar. That’s just the excuse UMC liberals use. If they change the Calendar, they’ll just not go and not have an excuse ( see: Douglas Park)
Drew will have to be UNDER 55%.
I think low 50’s and you’ll have a shot, but if 6 out of 10 kids are getting free lunch? No. You will not get a ground swell.

You guys need to get shirts printed

#NOAPSOVER50

No Schools Over Fifty

Arlington can and should do better.[/quote]

As a goal, that is literally impossible without county-wide busing. I appreciate the snappiness of your slogan, but it's not realistic. All we're asking for is a proposal that works within APS's own criteria and doesn't have Drew come out the loser on literally every metric, seemingly in order to benefit other schools. Then we'll see if Drew can make it work at 60 with a great principal, or not. [/quote]

No its not impossible.  The 'diversity' map just including south arlington had school ranging from 35-64 with a 50 percent among the 8 schools.  https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Single-Consideration-Maps-Packet.pdf

But if we are serious about this- we need to attack the problem now.  We cannot hold walkability up as the number one value.  As soon as you do that- Randolph is always at 80%.   
We absolutely cannot hold 'fake walkability' up as a value whatsoever (e.g. yes my kids are eligible for bus service, but maybe one day we will walk- I'm looking at you Fairlington South of 395.)[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics