Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Brookings Institution article about the new MCPS middle school magnet selection process "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]Is it possible that mcps is finally moving towards a magnet program for the best and brightest per test scores[/b] rather than skewing heavily towards privileged kids with parents equipped to advocate? And, is there anything wrong with that?[/quote] Is this failed sarcasm? Did you actually read the *****g article?[/quote] You must be one of the "parents equipped to advocate."[/quote] Anyone who has been following this knows the county moved to universal merit-based selection and away from the older system where students were nominated by their parents. Some people don't like this because admissions are more competitive.[/quote] OMG, will you stop with this?! MCPS will not release any admissions data because high metrics (the so-called 99%ers) were not the chief criteria. "Peer cohort" was used to weed out many top-achieving W-feeder school students to keep them in their home schools with two token "enriched" courses. This was done in order to admit more students from underachieving schools, as a proxy for race (which did not work as well as MCPS had hoped). Very few of even the self-reported scores on DCUM indicated top metrics for admitted students.[/quote] And haven't there been umpteen threads that the ability of COGAT and other standardized tests to distinguish between 99% and 97% is pretty minimal. I wouldn't get so worked up about a poor kid earning a 92% (who hasn't had all the advantages in life of his richer peer) "sneaking" his way into the gifted program.[/quote] DP.. then why not let the 99% in and not the 97% if you shouldn't get so worked up about a few % points. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics