Reply to Long running series huge plot holes

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Long running series huge plot holes"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]TV is about escapism. Watching a parent juggle a child is not escape. Kids are not interesting or entertaining or it's a family sitcom type show that they don't really make anymore. I agree, the kids thing bugs me, but I also would stop watching the show if all it became was them taking care of kids. [/quote]

I think you're missing the point.  Writers often create babies as a plot point, then turn around and eliminate characters b/c it's hard to work with children.  It's also weird for a character's arc when you make them a parent then make the kids nonexistent.  It's easy stop introducing kids as props.[/quote]

I actually think the early seasons of Friends had the Ross/dad story line pretty heavily featured and they handled that well. Plus, he had joint custody, so it made sense that he wasn't always around. But yeah, the Rachel thing was dumb. Would've been much better to have Monica and Chandler have the kids and show that transition. And agree, Meredith Gray went way to quickly from 0 kids to 3. I don't even know their names or sexes besides the oldest, Zola. One's Bailey? Who knows about the third....[/quote]

Didn’t watch either friends or gray’s anatomy.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics