Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Hat tip to Trump for his unassailable SCOTUS pick"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Merrick Garland. His treatment during the DC Circuit nomination and during the Supreme Court nomination is ample evidence of how much Republicans have politicized appointments. You can no longer expect passive acceptance of a judge based on resume. You created this problem, now live with it.[/quote] Actually, the Democrats started it with Bork.[/quote] Nominees have been rejected several times since the beginning of the nation. George Washington's recess appointment of John Rutledge as Chief Justice was rejected in 1795. Nixon had 2 nominees rejected in 1969 and 1970. Please read more history to get a better perspective. [/quote] There's a reason that the name Bork is used when attacking someone through organized vilification. He was treated terribly. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Bork [/quote] Go back a little further and read about how terribly Bork treated the rule of law during the Nixon administration. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics