Reply to What is life like inside Buckingham Palace?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "What is life like inside Buckingham Palace?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Traditionally the monarchy was boring and staid. Diana being glamorous was the exception rather than the rule. Kate is simply confirming to the staid unflashiness of what the monarchy traditionally was. And she seems to like it, it’s not imposed on her. [/quote]

Guess you didn't know about Margaret.

[img]https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/books/2017/09/22/TELEMMGLPICT000141148256_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqndiIBtEViA84rOw8lBGavctmUwbRbg3iRpHS4m-OfAE.jpeg?imwidth=1240[/img]

[b]Traditionally the monarchy has been the wealthiest family in any country and therefore have been living opulent/decadant lives far above anyone else's dreams basically prior to the 1920s [/b]when cameras became widely available and all the revolutions really kicked into gear. Now we just have a fish eye lenses on them and so they're either cutting back or reining it in as much as possible as far as expenses.

[/quote]

??? Decadent? Maybe in other countries, but not in Great Britain — at least, not since Charles II. The Hanovers were famously stodgy, and Victoria cracked down on the brief liveliness of the Regency.

Wealthiest? Not since Tudor times, and even then, it was iffy. Great aristocratic families like the Devonshires usually had more wealth (and often far more property) than the British royal family.

These oddities may in fact go far to explaining why there was never a revolution that dethroned them.

(Reposting due to formatting error above, ugh)[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics