Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Handmaid's Tale Season 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] if you think this show rings eerily true[/quote].[b]..then you are an alarmist, similar to a doomsday [b]prepper. [/b] There are good people on both sides of the two major parties. This book/show is so FAR from today's reality. I'm not complicit, nor a MAGA supporter, but I do know that this would not happen [i]today[/i]. I will be highly irritated if the producers try to draw a straight line from MAGA to Gilead. [/quote] +1. Please provide evidence of something concrete that has Happened that’s similar to the show. [/quote] I mean I’m not getting carried away but it’s undeniable that the blend of Christian extremism and misogyny from the show is ascendant in America. To pull a few episodes that would be right at home in a Handmaid’s Tale flashback, [b]NC Bathroom Laws, [/b]Fox News, “incel” murderers, Liberty U, Melania, that “religious freedom” EO draft that circulated, etc etc[/quote] Not allowing men to use women’s restrooms and vice versa is akin to the handmaidens take?! I hate Fox News but don’t know what comparison you’re drawing there either. Melania?!? What does she have to do with this?? You’re an extremist. [/quote] Totally! The flashbacks in HT are all about creeping social and governmental [b]restriction of gender roles. [/b]The bathroom bill is a solid example. The right wing pearl clutching about the boy scouts is another. Transgender military ban, etc. Melania is totally relevant. She represents both surface reverance for a regressive gender-specific ideal (she shows up, she is beautiful and deferential, and [b]she rarely speaks) [/b]and the obvious breakdown of the theoretically underpinning morality. She’s his third wife and his constant philandering and related shenanigans renders her carefully crafted image ridiculous or at least a little sad as long as she publicly ignores it. Melania is very blue lady. To be clear, I don’t care what arrangement Melania has with her husband and she’s under no obligation to discuss it. I think a big part of the problem is the role of First Lady and I would love to see it go away or be blown up by Melania or someone else. I hate to be even a little critical of Michelle O, but she very deliberately (with good cause, I know!) left that on the table.But there’s no question that Melania is relevant to the GOP, [b]particularly the men in power, claiming the mantle of Christianity or a family-centered morality while very consistently and obviously living otherwise themselves. Which is extremely related to Gilead. [/b] Again, not saying we’re on a path to Gilead or anything but to deny the obvious connections is to be deliberately obtuse. [/quote] You know Melaniia rarely speaks and how? Maybe instead of being deferential she just doesn’t give a sh$t? In terms of the men in power - this has been going on since the beginning of time. It certainly didn’t start with the GOP. Regarding the bathroom bill, I see it as the exact opposite. That we have come so far in breaking down gender roles that legislation is required to keep men out of the ladies room. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics