Reply to Handmaid's Tale Season 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Handmaid's Tale Season 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] if you think this show rings eerily true[/quote].[b]..then you are an alarmist, similar to a doomsday [b]prepper.  [/b]

There are good people on both sides of the two major parties. This book/show is so FAR from today's reality.  I'm not complicit, nor a MAGA supporter, but I do know that this would not happen [i]today[/i].   I will be highly irritated if the producers try to draw a straight line from MAGA to Gilead.   [/quote]

+1.  Please provide evidence of something concrete that has Happened that’s similar to the show.  [/quote]

I mean I’m not getting carried away but it’s undeniable that the blend of Christian extremism and misogyny from the show is ascendant in America. To pull a few episodes that would be right at home in a Handmaid’s Tale flashback, [b]NC Bathroom Laws, [/b]Fox News, “incel” murderers, Liberty U, Melania, that “religious freedom” EO draft that circulated, etc etc[/quote]

Not allowing men to use women’s restrooms and vice versa is akin to the handmaidens take?!

I hate Fox News but don’t know what comparison you’re drawing there either.

Melania?!?   What does she have to do with this??

You’re an extremist.  [/quote]

Totally! The flashbacks in HT are all about creeping social and governmental restriction of gender roles. The bathroom bill is a solid example. The right wing pearl clutching about the boy scouts is another. Transgender military ban, etc.

Melania is totally relevant. She represents both surface reverance for a regressive gender-specific ideal (she shows up, she is beautiful and deferential, and she rarely speaks) and the obvious breakdown of the theoretically underpinning morality. She’s his third wife and his constant philandering and related shenanigans renders her carefully crafted image ridiculous or at least a little sad as long as she publicly ignores it. Melania is very blue lady.

To be clear, I don’t care what arrangement Melania has with her husband and she’s under no obligation to discuss it. I think a big part of the problem is the role of First Lady and I would love to see it go away or be blown up by Melania or someone else. I hate to be even a little critical of Michelle O, but she very deliberately (with good cause, I know!) left that on the table.But there’s no question that Melania is relevant to the GOP, particularly the men in power, claiming the mantle of Christianity or a family-centered morality while very consistently and obviously living otherwise themselves. Which is extremely related to Gilead.

Again, not saying we’re on a path to Gilead or anything but to deny the obvious connections is to be deliberately obtuse. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics