Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Scaramucci's wife files for divorce"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can see The Mooch being a total horndog. My guess is that The Mooch will be banging a lot of SEC-educated GOP operatives in their 20s over the next year. He seems to have no self-control.[/quote] He's filthy rich, handsome, Harvard Law School. high profile high status job. And now single. Yes, he can and should pull plenty of prime talent. Why wouldn't he?[/quote] Besides this divorce helps him fufill the typical conservative white male dream ; getting rid of an aging wife for a younger one . Wash , rinse, repeat .[/quote] He's 50 and she was only in her 30s. I worked on Wall Street after college for several years in the late 90s. [b]This guy is a coke addict.[/b][/quote] I'm a conservative, older DCUM poster and was wondering about that myself.[/quote] If it is was OK to use a coke by a former us president, why is it not ok to use a coke for the current president's staff?[/quote] I'm pretty anti-cocaine myself. So I'd classify it as never okay. But if you can't see the difference with experimenting with Coke in college, 25 years before becoming POTUS! And active, ongoing use while serving as a key member of POTUS's staff, DCUM can't help you. Sorta how GWB was fine, even though he was a recovering alcoholic, because that was in his past, and he had learned to control the illness. But a POTUS who was an active alcohol would be an issue. [/quote] Unless you know for a fact Scaramucci used coke that day before that interview, you are using drug related characteristics to support your argument he overplayed his hand. You don't need to use these to support your premise if you have proof. Otherwise, STFU, Becky.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics