Reply to Was it appropriate for Obama to actively investigate presidential campaign during election

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Was it appropriate for Obama to actively investigate presidential campaign during election "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is sort reminiscent of J Edgar Hoover. [/quote]

This.

Obama was meddling in the democratic process. He is a hypocrite accusing Russians of interfering in our election but at the same time doing the exact same thing.

Why did his administration ask for the wiretapping of Trump's communication in the first place?

So many unanswered questions ... Was there an approved warrant to tap Mike Flynn's phone? Who else on the trump team was the government listening to their communications?

If Paul Ryan has any spine, he should call for an investigation into the Obama administration's meddling in our democratic process.[/quote]

Warrants were given based on evidence, not a political witch hunt. There are a lot of unanswered questions, but don't worry, in America we generally get our answers during a trial.
[/quote]

Obama can't hide behind the FISA court. His administration is the only one in history that eavesdropped the opposing team's campaign.  I am glad you agree there should be a trial for the Obama administration's abuse of power.[/quote]

You sound just like Trmp.  Assertions without any evidence,[/quote]

No one is denying the eavesdropping anymore. The democrats are using the FISA court as their get-out-of-jail-free card. Do you know any other president eavesdropped his opponent? Richard Nixon (Watergate) ...[/quote]

Were you involved and know beyond a doubt that the FBI wiretapped Trump's phones? If not, where's your proof that it happened?

FYI:  Nixon ordered 2 burglaries of the DNC headquarters. Highly illegal. He also approved secret, ILLEGAL wiretapping of the DNC looking for something incriminating to use against his adversary in the 1972 election. The Nixon administration did not have the FBI go to a judge with evidence that the DNC was doing something illegal and say, "Can we get an order to eavesdrop?"  If the FBI came to Obama and said, we are going to ask for a permit to wiretap RNC / Trump campaign phones because there is something going on between them and Russia , well I expect the FBI went to court and secured the proper permissions to do that.    Do you think the FBI should ignore evidence of wrong doing and not go after something questionable?  Did you also think they should not be going after Hillary's emails?

Gotta say, you republicans sure like your false equivalences.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics