Reply to New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I understand why ECNL would want Tophat. But why would Tophat want ECNL? They are thriving in GA and and have tons of visibility. USYNT and P4 placements are consistent and in line with top clubs in the nation. And the club is very profitable. A switch to ECNL would have significant uncertainty.[/quote]

I can think of a couple of reasons.  From a club perspective, they want to compete against better teams.  You literally have to go back two seasons ago to find conference winner in that area that was NOT TH.  In any age group.  Their teams are great, but would still likely benefit from playing stronger competition.  From a parent perspective, they probably also want better competition, but it is extremely frustrating to travel so far to play teams that aren’t really competitive when you can have more competition in your area if you had a different badge.  [/quote]

I hear that perspective, but I think it assumes that league affiliation is the primary driver of development, and Tophat is proving that’s not necessarily true.

At a certain point, when you’re consistently producing top-level players, placing into top college programs, and getting United States Youth National Team looks, the marginal benefit of switching leagues becomes pretty limited. Tophat is already getting the outcomes most clubs are chasing.

On the competition piece, yes, there’s value in stronger week-to-week games, but Tophat is clearly supplementing that through showcases and national events. The best clubs don’t rely solely on league play to define their level, they create the right competitive environments around it.

From a parent perspective, I get the frustration with travel for uneven games, but that’s more of a league parity issue than a development issue (its one you will find in ECNL leagues as well). It clearly hasn’t slowed down player progression at Tophat at all.

At the end of the day, they’re demonstrating something pretty important: you don’t need to be in the perceived “top” league to develop elite players or achieve elite outcomes. They already have visibility, results, and a strong business model. A move to ECNL introduces uncertainty without a clear upside that they aren’t already capturing.
[/quote]

No, I firmly believe that training sessions are the primary driver of development that a club can provide.  I just think if we are making a pros/cons list, competition and travel are definitely in the cons list for GA and pros list for ECNL….for this particular club.  They’ve clearly demonstrated that they don’t NEED to be in ECNL to be successful though.[/quote]

The top 5 performing clubs from both GA and ECNL should have a big tournament each year.[/quote]
They already do.

Surf Cup = West Coast
Jeff Cup = East Coast

Why do we need to keep giving money to leagues?[/quote]

Which league does better?[/quote]

It's impossible to compare since they're not necessarily evenly matched in the flights, but you know the answer. ECNL by a landslide[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics