Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Also [b]if there is so much housing going up in Bethesda why are they putting regional programs in BCC that will draw more kids there? [/b]Gmafb, they are doing this because it is more comfortable for the BCC families to not change their boundaries.[/quote] Very good question, when according to the CIP, BCC has fewer than 100 open seats, and is projected to be at capacity soon: [url]https://gis.mcpsmd.org/cipmasterpdfs/MP26_Chapter4BCC.pdf[/url][/quote] So did they do the analysis of housing pipeline only for WJ/Woodward? That's also kind of weird and sounds suspiciously like they didn't actually do any analysis at all.[/quote] In theory the housing pipeline is part of the CIP projections every year. But they haven't been very good at forecasting.[/quote] I don't see that anywhere in the CIP. I only see vague narratives at the beginning of each chapter about how much housing is allowed by master plans and in some cases they use the word "pipeline". No idea how much is in approved projects by cluster.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics