Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "GA & MLS NEXT Form Strategic Alliance"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is strategic, not something that will happen overnight. When DA folded, ECNL was there, established, and had positioned themselves to take over the girls game. That is the position GA is in right now. No one knows where college will be in the next 3+ years. Last I heard they were wanting to be governed by US Soccer as well… [/quote] 1000% true. Eventually NWSL is going to need to focus on the quality of the product they put on the field. Once this happens GA MLSN and US Soccer will be where they turn.[/quote] Lol. Why the GA? [/quote] Firstly because they are self sanctioned now, less red tape compared to ECNL. Second, NWSL will get more of what it wants. ECNL doesn’t need a pro pathway, and they’re not setup for it, easier to set the pathway up from GA than a platform that is largely a scholarship program. Third, have you seen women’s college soccer? It’s awful. Watch the national championship, first touches bouncing 8 yards like a u-little match. That is what academy soccer produces for NCAA. If you were NWSL wouldn’t you want a platform that you can shape almost ground up vs current brick-touch Academy soccer? [/quote] I assumed the atrocious technical skills at the “top” local clubs was a reflection of the DMV ECNL-G programs and things were different in the bigger US soccer markets, but, after watching several women’s games in the NCAA tournament a few weeks ago, it seems to me we have a universal and systemic problem in the US. I don’t watch much NWSL, but it’s not like this in the pro women’s leagues in England and Spain. I’m not commenting on overall quality as it goes without saying that a pro in one of those leagues should be a better player than someone playing even in a top college program. I’m commenting on basic skills, like receiving the ball, that young adults should have developed years ago. But I don’t see how GA is any better positioned to fix things—there just aren’t enough good coaches in the US. [/quote] Outside of Real Madrid and Barcelona, NWSL teams are better than teams in the Spanish league. NWSL is also a better league than the English League based on quality of players and teams. Nobody on UNC or Wake Forest could “receive the ball”? Please stop. Tell me you know nothing about women’s sports without telling me you know nothing about women’s sports. [/quote] Oh the irony in your last sentence. It is pretty clear that there are 8-10 teams in Europe that would win the NWSL year in and year out. The NWSL has parity, which is great, but no team in NWSL would win England, France, Spain league at this point. Of the top 50 best womens footballers in the world. 10 play in the NWSL. 40 play in Europe………… [/quote] I think that's pretty wrong, but let's say you are right, what does that say about the current state of girls youth soccer in the U.S.? ECNL getting it done? Switching to SY going to change things? Title IX and the college system gave us a head start but is it good enough now?[/quote] I did not just make it up. You can quibble that it is Eurocentric list but I dont have much to argue against its accuracy. https://www.theguardian.com/football/ng-interactive/2024/dec/03/the-100-best-female-footballers-in-the-world-2024 The WSL is an Academy structure. They start playing the club style at u12/u13 and they focus on technical as well as team play. There is nothing fundamentally wrong with US style of soccer but it is still trying to “out athlete” or “send Trinity” style, which will work against the 2nd tier of nations. But what is more likely, that the US dominated womens soccer on the world stage for years because A) for some reason the US understood womens soccer better than Europe or B) that nobody in Europe cared about womens soccer? Now that there is investment in the womens side of things (coaching, facilities, salaries) in Europe my bet is that the US will still be competitive but it wont dominate ever again. I love the athlete that Rodman is but I could have made a 15 minute lowlight reel of her first touch in the Gold Cup games. I am being a little facetious but I would take 11 Rose Lavelles over 11 Trinity Rodmans all day every day. But that is just my opinion having been a coach, referee and dad to high level girls soccer players. [/quote] I like Trinity, you have to keep in mind that she's a huge natural talent that's a product of a US youth development process. She could have been much much more. But what's to complain about she made it to the USWNT and NWSL. Why shoot for perfection when good enough pays the bills.[/quote] She might be the highest salaried US player in the world right now but there are women in Europe making 3X her wages…………..there is a reason Sam Kerr left the Red Stars for England, and it wasnt the food…………[/quote] Please name one national team in the world that would not start Trinity Rodman.[/quote] Are you serious? Spain, Germany, Brazil, maybe England depending. She doesnt fit the style of play for those nations. She fits the US style of play to a T. If she is a world beater, why doesnt she go to England or Spain and make more than $250k a year? It is why Cole Palmer never saw the field for Man City but is player of the year for Chelsea. [/quote] They would all take her and start her. She’s the #5 player in your Guardian rankings lol. Maybe she’s happy playing in the country she’s grown up in and where her family is? Why doesn’t Cole Palmer go to Saudi Arabia and make more money? Everything isn’t about money. You’re definitely one of the ROI youth soccer parents. Also Cole Palmer went to Chelsea because he wasn’t going to beat out Mahrez and Silva. At least that’s what Pep Guardiola said in an interview.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics