Reply to ECNL moving to school year part 2

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL moving to school year part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As a September parent I’m not interesting in dual rostering my kid.

The top level in my state is ECNL.  If MLSN AD plays games were out.

They need to roster everyone within the new bands and move on. [/quote]

Not happening in MLSN strong Q3/4 can still play BY and if clubs feel like a player is not starter level they should be moved to SY team to offset those minutes they are losing on BY team giving players more opportunities.That was MLSN rationale for keeping both.

Parents will always and should always move kids to what’s best for them.[/quote]

That's the problem. The Q3/Q4 kids that are good enough for the BY team but wouldn't get max playing time would have to go down two levels of play since they can't play for the MLSN1 team at their SY age level. Unless they bioband, I can't imagine why they would stay instead of going to ECNL. 
[/quote]

That makes sense if you're high

What's "max playing time"?
There's no MLS1, only MLS Next 
MLS Next isn't SY so there's no SY age level

Your skill level isn't tied to the calendar quarter you were born in. If that were the case, no kid would ever play up successfully. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics