Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It’s so weird but also so predictable that I. Two pages, DCUM goes from “there is no shred of evidence he was trans” to “who cares?” The FBI has confirmed the partner of the killer is a male to female and they lived together romantically. The partner is cooperating with the FBI and has confirmed this herself. It certainly explains motive and settles the “actually he was a far right Nazi” question. Can we move on now and accept he was radicalized to the left? Not touching the furry thing other than that it explains the engravings somewhat. Beyond that, I don’t think it is relevant.[/quote] Having a transgender partner doesn’t explain motive. All it establishes is a personal detail about the killer’s life, not why the attack happened. A motive requires evidence that the act was driven by a specific belief system, grievance, or goal. Saying “he dated a trans woman, therefore he was radicalized to the left” is a logical leap — it’s like saying someone who dates a Christian must be motivated by Christianity. Until there’s actual proof, like writings, statements, or affiliations tying the violence to left-wing ideology, the partner’s gender identity doesn’t settle anything about motive.[/quote] Missing the forest for the trees…we need gun control, mental health resources, empathy.[/quote] Charlie Kirk didn’t think highly of empathy.[/quote] Well Charlie would still be alive today playing with his babies if we focused more on the above. [/quote] +1 You reap what you sow. And the "reaping" isn't always accompanied by good people or a socially palatable method. Reaping doesn't mean deserving, it means [b]natural, unsurprising consequence[/b], note the distinction. [/quote] Not sure what country or time period you live in but in NO ONE’s law book, govt, or faith is it “natural and unsurprising” to unilaterally decide shoot someone down for what they have said in public forums. Or private ones. That’s anarchy, lawlessness, chaos, not to mention unethical, illegal and immoral in most religions and societies. — Note the distinction of your illogic and falsities. And zero understanding of due process.[/quote] You are missing the point. I was not saying violence is legal, moral, or justified. I was saying it can be a predictable consequence. “Reaping what you sow” in that context means unsurprising outcome, not rightful punishment. Condemning the act as illegal or immoral is valid, but it does not address the claim of inevitability.[/quote] Nope. Shooting down a politician or activist is not a “predictable consequence” nor “unsurprising outcome” nor “inevitability” of them being a vocal politician or activist. Get professional help Pp. [/quote] In a country where uncivilized politicians enact wil wild West style gun laws, shooting down a politician is a predictable consequence , indeed. Facts don't care about your fragile and hypocritical feelings .[/quote] Speaking of facts, what you cited - shooting down a politician - is indeed extremely rare in America and most countries. Plus Charlie Kirk was quite civilized when he spoke. That was his model- or else it wouldn’t work, watch the shows. Thanks for playing, better luck next time! [/quote] I don’t think the following quote counts as civilized. CHARLIE KIRK (HOST): I know what you're thinking, we've got to get Joe Biden out of the way so we can run against Kammy. Oh my goodness, is she beatable. It's like Black Hillary on steroids. Is she Black? I guess she says she's Caribbean or whatever. ... She would be a lot easier to beat than Joe Biden. Joe Biden is a bumbling dementia filled Alzheimer's corrupt tyrant who should honestly be put in prison and/or given the death penalty for his crimes against America. [/quote] Honest and accurate. That’s what I’d call that. But she was no black Hillary. Hillary was well-qualified, and I hated to see her in that neutered Dept of State role Obama put her in. But she was corrupt. [/quote] Neutered? How is Secretary of State a neutered role? Not only did Hillary get that but Obama cleared the field out intentionally for Hillary’s “pathway to the nomination”. That is why the party is still ruined to this day. Except Bernie, no Democrat challenged Hillary in 2016. She wanted a coronation [/quote] Omg, every FSO officers knows all she did was fly around for a couple years doing meet & greets while Putin took over Crimea, Iran developed nukes, and No Korea buddies up with Russia. This is well documented. She accomplished nothing when she should have been let loose to do foreign policy. Obama gets a F in foreign policy as a president, and every think tank in town agrees. He also gets an F for backing Hillary and all her baggage. Not so sure he did really back here and I was living in Philly at the time, a big swing state. [/quote] So you say.[/quote] Well what do you say about Hillary’s State Dept accomplishments and Obama’s foreign policy track record? He did last minute race into Libya via executive order to help the EU keep some oil flowing. But Arab Spring failed too, as we all know. [/quote] I don't have anything to say these are your questions and pretexts that concern you not mine, I never said they did.[/quote] NP. Good then stop responding to things you clearly know nothing about. You look ridiculous. Not clear why you’re even on this board, you have nothing to say. [/quote] Don't need to do what you say so disregarding this post. Your insults don't mean anything.[/quote] You sure do a good job of disregarding posts PP, kudos! And you keep posting nothings at the same time, so hilarious! [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics