Reply to Boundary Review Meetings

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Boundary Review Meetings"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is what Reid said she will likely put forth as amendments to her original plan. She said she'll release Thursday. (This is my AI overview of her remarks):

-   Proceed now with moving Walney Oaks (SPA 4420) from Franklin MS to Rocky Run MS.
-   Defer decisions on Rolling Valley ES split feeder to a new review, with potential relief recommendations due January 2027.
-   Defer Beech Tree ES moves tied to Glasgow MS relief; first implement the new Poe AAP center, then report back in January 2027 on Glasgow enrollment and demographics.
-   Set January 2027 reviews for:
    -   Rolling Valley ES
    -   Beech Tree ES
    -   Lorton Station / Gunston / Halley / Laurel Hill area
    -   Graham Greenway / Jefferson Village / Kingsley Commons area
    -   Crossfield-to-Lee’s Corner 12-student move and related SPAs north of 395 aligned to Edison HS.
-   Cardinal Forest / Keene Mill boundary question remains under staff review and may or may not be amended depending on new analysis and further input.[/quote]

Those dastardly West Springfield moms and their SPA’s north of 395! This was all their doing! :lol:[/quote]

Well, too bad for them. McDaniel said he wants to put WSHS on the list and thinks its overcrowded. He wants them added to the review for next year.[/quote]

McDaniel hates West Springfield (the community) because he has a hatred for Pat Herrity and hates the Springfield community for continuing to elect Herrity.

McDaniel is doung this over a political grudge against 22153/22153, not because he cares about rezoning or capacity at WSHS.[/quote]

DP.  West Springfield is identified as the most overcrowded HS in the draft CIP.  They lose credibility when they propose to move kids out of Justice, Marshall, and McLean, but not West Springfield.  If you think their calculations are wrong you should demand a moratorium on any boundary changes until they audit how they are coming up with their program capacities and forecasts. Attacking individual board members reacting to the information in front of them isn’t a good look.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics