Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "IAC Lacrosse"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]It isn't worth it for a school saddled with over $20mm in construction debt and a low endowment to run a sports team like a college with large tuition discounts for several kids per year. Prep grew to 550 students and is still financially struggling despite being twice the cost of a Jesuit education anywhere else. Giblin's way did win a lot of games and did help a few kids per year go to selective colleges for lacrosse. But it didn't serve the school well to lump so much toward that. If Bullis and Landon want to overload in this direction then the healthier thing for Prep to do is remind itself to be an academic school first. Have a looksie at Bullis and Landkn matriculation numbers, then strip out lacrosse. Non athlete hooked kids from those schools don't go to selective colleges. So why run a school to benefit less than 5% of the kids who attended? That's dumb. And maybe Prep can be great at baseball, tennis, golf, soccer, swimming or wrestling. Last time I checked those sports had 2x to 4x as many colleges with scholarship programs. In the bigger picture lacrosse did nothing to lift Prep during the Giblin years. Academically and financially the school only went worse in the last decade. Building another dorm and bringing back the old coach isn't what the administration is focused on now, or should they be. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics