Reply to Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Initial boundary options for Crown/Damascus study "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous ][quote=Anonymous]Suddenly, I feel like QO high school is shining great among all 4 options. It is within walking distance, no busing and kids stay together from ES/MS. [/quote]

Great as long as you are not in Kentlands.[/quote]

why[/quote]

Busing the Kentlands to Gaithersburg or Crown is just absurd. Not that I’m not enjoying the maga there whose tiny racist brain cells are exploding about these new boundaries but because they are fiscally irresponsible of the county and stupid. Kentlands walks to QO there is no reality sending them to the other HS makes sense logistically or fiscally.

As for Dufief yes

As for Stonemill out of W again no because W  is already under enrolled. And the mapping logic makes no sense either.

They will do the worst possible senerio people get ready for major bussing. [/quote]

You realize parts of dufief, stone mill and Travilah of basically equidistant to Wootton? And Dufief has maybe 35 kids per grade TOTAL. Dufief is part of the Wootton community, has been since forever. They don’t want to move schools. Moving them doesn’t help anything. Wootton is under enrolled, as you said. Just leave dufief alone. [/quote]

How about just leaving Wootton alone. Why does MCPS create 4 options just to generate fights between different ES within Wootton? That’s pure evil and community dividing. Crown is built to alleviate overcrowding of other schools and Wootton is not overcrowded. None of the four options change diversity of any school so just leave Wootton alone. Don’t make the poorer neighborhoods in Wootton to pay the price just to satisfy this diversity game.

[/quote]

I am PP of above- yes, totally agree. Leave Wootton alone. But they won’t. [/quote]

Everyone supporting leaving Wootton alone, I stand with you as I went to CJMS/WCHS but had so many friends go to Wootton.

Anyway as a resident of Wayside now who is across the street from the proposed border, I want to stay at WCHS.

Wootton folks, if you can sign this petition it can’t hurt your case the less likely they are to shift Churchill to Wootton the less likely they are to shift schools from Wootton to elsewhere.

https://chng.it/SNLndcftLR
[/quote]

I will not be signing that. You guys are nothing but a bunch of Karens. You talk about your “community” as if you’re an indigenous tribe or something. Your kids will be fine and will attend a less crowded school, which directly helps all the concerns listed on the petition. [/quote]

DP. I'm so confused by this sentence: "Churchill’s current overcapacity is minor and, according to MCPS’s own projections, will resolve naturally in the coming years."  That's just false. MCPS's own projections show Churchill ending up at 117%, 335 students over capacity.

[url]https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XFy9zZzp1muWHlUraVzOkRRL_ZGPLSWq/view[/url][/quote]

According to most kids at Churchill the school isn’t crowded. They have four portables because they have so many special ed students and programs with kids bussed into Churchill.

The projection data linked makes no sense, it shows that after removing Wayside which has a total population of around 450 or 60-75 per grade that the Churchill enrollment will drop by 479 in 27-28 and 472 in 30-31. That doesn’t math when the removed school’s population in total is that much! That’s what they are saying with and without the change the impact would be which is impossible.[/quote]

According to the kids lol

Special ed kids are part of the school population [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics