Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Travel Discussion
Reply to "Don't fly United"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]The problem for me is the mixed discussion of legalities and what United and the police "should have done". The two are different. First, let's get a couple of things clear. The O'Hare Airport Police are police. That's it. They are certified law enforcement officers and you listen to them the same as you would a Chicago PD officer, because that's what they are. They don't have to wear a uniform, some are plainclothes, and there is no question that all of them identified themselves to the doctor as to what they were. The plainclothes officer displayed a badge. None of this is in dispute. It's probable that the gate agent didn't communicate to the police the reason the passenger was being deboarded. Airport police deal all day with people who have to be deboarded because they are drunk, belligerant, crazy, etc., and many of them don't want to get off and have to be forcibly removed, just like some drunks in bars. It isn't pretty, but the protocol is the same, as mentioned above: ASK, then TELL, then MAKE. I appreciate the comment by some LEOs that if they knew that a person was simply being deboarded as an overbook and the person refused, they would put it back on the gate agent to try to work it out before using force. I commend that approach, but these guys were under no obligation to take it when the passenger defied a direct instruction, and more than likely the Captain or someone else in authority had told the police that the person's license to travel was revoked, that they were now a trespasser, and needed to be removed. The outcome of the people dragged off to the cheers of the passengers is usually that the cops don't arrest the person and they work out whatever they work out -- usually a flight the next day -- with the airline after the incident. The police use force to remove the person, then go on their way. The reason for the outrage is the nature of the "offense" by the person sought to be removed, which was simply to refuse the airline's revocation of his license to travel on their airline after he had taken his seat on the plane. There's no question legally that the airline is within its rights to revoke that license in the face of positive-space company travelers on an otherwise-full flight, and there is no question that when asked to remove a passenger by the Captain or other airline authority, the police are entitled to use force if the person refuses. It's always ugly, which is why imperious gate agent idiots should call the police only as a last resort, and should exercise judgment before doing so. In the case of an otherwise-appropriately-behaving overbook who refuses to leave the plane, probably supervisors or the station manager should be involved before calling the police; it should not be a gate agent decision. That should be an important policy change at United and its express carriers. There should also be some guidance, if there isn't at present, as to what to do if crew shows up with positive space (or higher) priority at the gate after a full flight has been boarded and not enough volunteers come forward. There is an amount of money that, if offered, would have secured volunteers. In hindsight, it would have been worth spending that amount of money last night. After that, you can IDB people who have already boarded, but if they refuse to go, common sense has to prevail before you call the cops. They got 3 off without the police being involved. It was an enormous mistake by the airline's people to call the police instead of taking a step back and seeing if they couldn't find a single volunteer for $2000, or call the station manager for guidance, etc. That said, the doctor should have complied with the police instruction. I have seen enough of these incidents to know that the police tell you very quietly and calmly after making the request and then the instruction that you refuse, that you are going to be leaving the plane and that they will be taking you off if you don't go voluntarily. At this point, it was extremely poor judgment for the doctor to refuse to go. There were many other alternatives available to him; creating a disturbance like that is entirely-bad-judgment. The AIRLINE may be in the wrong for taking you off, but it isn't up to the police to arbitrate this stuff, and likely they only knew that the person had been deemed by the airline to be a trespasser at this point. And, frankly, it's pretty self-important to refuse the police request and then instruction, and to think that if you make enough of a scene, you won't have to go. What the doctor did was wrong, regardless of whether the airline should have handled the situation better, which there is no question that they should have. I certainly don't want to see how much acting out by passengers is now going to occur when the police ask them to get off the plane. Saying that the police shouldn't have done this, blah blah, is only going to cause more delays as more idiots create more drama when asked to leave the plane. And I'm sure that politicians are going to leap all over this and try to impose stupid rules that won't help the problem. What should happen, I think, is that airlines should put in place policies to avoid dragging folks off the plane for higher-priority passengers. And they should take the authority to involve the police away from the gate agent when the issue is merely boarding priority, not bad acts by the passenger. It isn't that hard to imagine how one might set this up, and I think Oscar and his senior people and advisors should take a crack at coming up with a new policy before the politicians impose a stupid one on them. At the end of the day, though, I still put the major fault for this incident on the guy who said "screw you" when told by police that he was about to be dragged off the plane. United shouldn't have put him in that position, but ultimately he was the author of his own destiny.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics