Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "FCPS Boundary Review Updates"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]To level the playing field (because all the question data is compromised at this point) - you can literally just keep opening the pigeonhole site in an incognito window and voting for whatever you want as many times as you want. Fight fire with fire I guess - those of you with time and inclination. Or just upvote one of the Emerald Chase ones like 10000 times to show how the system is being gamed.[/quote] Wow. That works. I just upvoted the top HVE post three times to see for myself. Anyone with time on their hands can skew the upvotes. This is not a good way to gather feedback. Being heard by your local government officials on issues that directly impact your kids has devolved into bot-spamming a website like we are scalpers scooping up Taylor Swift tickets. Nice job, FCPS. There are 12 FCPS SB members. 3 of them are at-large members. My ES is divided up between 3 SB members. We are pissed off. Our ES alone could field candidates for half the SB seats next cycle. We are not political, we are simply anti-current FCPS leadership. The SB should not be party-based. Our candidates will run as independents and not seek or accept endorsements from FCDC or Fairfax GOP. Both of those organizations lack credibility with the candidates they have backed in recent years. Will we replace all 6? Probably not. But I bet there are other areas in the county that are motivated to field candidates and we could replace the at-large seats with a coordinated effort. This round of boundary review is just the beginning. This nonsense will happen every five years under the current policy. How do you think this process will look next time around, when “access to programming” comes back in vogue as the pendulum inevitably swings back. We need to replace the current leadership. That is the only way to solve this problem. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics