Reply to Who did you think killed JonBenet?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Who did you think killed JonBenet?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The dna found on the waist band of the tights she was wearing and on the underwear she was wearing when she died all came from the same unknown Hispanic male. [b]DNA doesn't lie[/b]. Her fingernail marks on her neck prove she was strangled with the garrote before the fatal blow to the head. [/quote]

From what I understand though, touch DNA can be from manufacturing. It doesn't tell the whole story, as in when transfer occurred. [/quote]
The same DNA was found under her fingernails. Clearly the guy wore gloves. His saliva is the DNA they found mixed in with her blood in her underwear. [/quote]

Where did you hear that this touch DNA was found under her fingernails?    As I understand it this scant DNA was found on her panties and her pajamas.  First I've heard about them finding any DNA under her fingernails.  If she was conscious and clawing at the rope around her neck you would expect there to be some of her own skin under her nails.  As far as I am aware that was not found.

[/quote]

The dna under her fingernails and in her underwear was not touch dna. The touch Dna came from the leggings.

http://jonbenetramsey.pbworks.com/w/page/11682463/DNA%20Evidence[/quote]

Former Boulder DA investigator Tom Bennett stated in 2004: "The DNA on the underwear may be from the killer, but it may not be," Bennett said."It`s minute DNA, like from a cough or sneeze.... You can`t just jump to conclusion it`s positive proof that will trace back to the killer." full article  http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=DC&p_theme=dc&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_field_label-0=Section&s_dispstring=%22took%20over%20the%20Ramsey%20case%20two%20years%20ago%22%20AND%20section(all)%20AND%20date(all)&p_field_advanced-0=&p_text_advanced-0=(%22took%20over%20the%20Ramsey%20case%20two%20years%20ago%22)&xcal_numdocs=20&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_useweights=no(registration required)[/quote]

If you read all of it and watched Monday's special on A &E you would know all the DNA is from the same unknown Hispanic male. Normal DNA under fingernails, and in her underwear mixed with her blood. The touch DNA is in 2 spots of her leggings. That is 6 places that this unknown Hispanic males DNA is on her or her clothing. [/quote]

This kid had been around a ton of people that day.  She could have had her hands sneezed or coughed on and then transferred the DNA from that cough/sneeze onto her leggings and underwear when she went to the bathroom.  The problem that I have with this is that the DNA is sooo scant.  If she was awake and fighting an intruder you would think that she would have the intruder's skin cells under her nails.  If an intruder was aggressively assaulting her and leaving his DNA behind why did he leave such an itty bitty small amount?

I think that this was inadvertent contamination.  Somebody sneezed or coughed at the autopsy or while tagging the evidence.  Or they used contaminated instruments (that had been used on another corpse) to take samples from JonBenet.

Did they examine an hispanic male's body on/around the same time that they examined JonBenet's body?  If so - that is where this evidence came from.  Surely they have the records from the medical examiner's office. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics