Reply to Wootton Announces They Have Formally Retained Silverman & Thompson

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Wootton Announces They Have Formally Retained Silverman & Thompson"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Stop stretching.  The reason for the move mainly is Wootton per you all is unsafe.  [/quote]

But it isn’t. Slide says it can be used tomorrow.[/quote]

The advocates for Wootton said it is unsafe.  MCPS wasn't saying that.  They catered to those complaining about the building who are now pretending that's not true.  They probably would never have done this if the advocates weren't so vocal about the building's safety.[/quote]

That’s not really an accurate framing.

Advocating for renovations isn’t the same as saying the school is “unsafe”—and what people consistently asked for was renovation at Wootton’s current location, not relocation.

Wootton was in the CIP and then removed multiple times. The community wasn’t pushing for some drastic solution—they were asking MCPS to follow through on long-planned modernization.

If anything, this situation exists because MCPS deferred and reshuffled its own priorities over several cycles.

Now relocation is being presented as the solution, but that’s not because advocates demanded it—it’s because prior commitments weren’t carried out.

So the idea that: “advocates complained and forced this outcome” gets it backwards.  Advocates asked for renovation. MCPS didn’t deliver, and is now proposing relocation to deal with the consequences of those decisions.[/quote]

You all said it was unsafe.  It’s documented all over the place.  Stop changing your story.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics