Reply to Why is there so much opposition to ending birthright citizenship?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Why is there so much opposition to ending birthright citizenship?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Adopting the notion that illegal immigrants could be classified as an "invading force" aligns with discussions that have been publicly and repeatedly raised by figures like Donald Trump. This perspective suggests that the sheer volume and impact of illegal immigration could logically be visualized by the American public as constituting an invading force. This framing taps into broader national security concerns and aligns with repeated mentions by political figures, thus reinforcing its plausibility in public discourse.

Such a classification would prompt a reevaluation of the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" clause of the 14th Amendment. If illegal immigrants were recognized under this new definition, their U.S.-born children might not automatically qualify for birthright citizenship. The traditional application of the 14th Amendment ensures citizenship to nearly all born on U.S. soil, excluding those whose parents are part of an invading force. By redefining illegal immigrants as such, this could fundamentally shift the practice of granting automatic citizenship to children of unauthorized immigrants.

This concept could be pursued through Executive Order or Congressional action, given its resonance with established concerns about immigration and national security. However, it would necessitate substantial legal revisions, likely involving both legislative changes and judicial interpretations to redefine what it means to be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics