Reply to Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So the contention is that Laci was kidnapped by the burglars, held for weeks until she gave birth and then, she and Connor were killed and their bodies dumped in the bay? [/quote]

There’s some criminal chick named Deanna Renfro (she even was Facebook friends with one of the burglars). She also knew the Medina family, the family that was robbed. The Medinas left for LA on the morning of Dec 24, and an hour later the burglars arrive to rob the house. In the house, a safe with over 50,000 in cash is robbed along with jewels. It’s not explained why there’s 50k in cash in that house, but when Scott’s defense wanted to test the safe for Laci’s fingerprints or hair, the Modesto police “destroyed the safe”. It was never found.

Deanna Renfro pawned Lacis watch on December 31, 2002. She knew the burglars, the homeowners, owned a van, had an extensive criminal history along with her burglar buddies, and the cops didn’t interrogate her for anything and the burglars didn’t give up her name either as the link who told them about the Medinas.

A police officer reported an unidentified woman swiftly ran into the police station some time after Dec 27th and threw the Medina jewelry on the counter and ran away. [/quote]

And somehow all this supposed connection to the neighbors means again that they kidnapped a pregnant woman, held her for months, allowed her to give birth and then killed her and the baby separately. In the meantime they pawned the pregnant lady’s watch linking them to her as well. Brilliant theory. [/quote]

How did the rope get tied in a bow over Connor? Was he born while Scott strangled her?

How did they get the watch? What happened to Lacis cell phone? You notice the cops don’t mention that’s missing right? They always wanted to pin it on Scott. She was taken. She wasn’t killed at home by Scott. She went for her walk and never returned [/quote]
Again, enough with the questions. Where is the detailed, coherent explanation (that you said you already provided but won't give a page number) of what might have actually happened instead?[/quote]

I don’t have to provide an alternative detailed theory. All that’s needed is to prove  reasonable doubt. If there’s any reasonable doubt, you aren’t supposed to convict especially to death.

There’s lots of reasonable doubt in this case from the clothing Lacis body was in, twine around Connors neck, the burglary, the watch, the burglar’s safe, the burned van with a bloody mattress, the SF Bay not closed as a crime scene as part of an active investigation, alibi getting publicized, ignoring tips  about strange vans and seeing a pregnant woman arguing with men. Modesto’s downtown area by the Airport district was and still is  drug and crime ridden, and the cadaver dogs kept trailing that way in the days after Laci’s disappearance. She probably was in one of those strange vans and never got out. The Robbers and Deanna all lived in the Airport district. [/quote]
We aren't a jury. We are people on a online forum. Reasonable doubt isn't enough to convince us. You need to tell us exactly what happened. Plus you said that you had already had done that which is a lie. So you clearly aren't doing too well here.[/quote]

DP. Actually no. No one needs to convince anyone else here of what happened. Its just a chat board for fat Marylanders. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics